I come in these minutes, the news of an attack on Silvio Berlusconi in Milan. But along with the news of the attack, I also come a number of statements of solidarity. Statements that I would rather not hear and that, frankly, seem more serious than the same aggression. Indeed, they themselves could be instigators of new attacks. He reminds me of Berlusconi, in some respects, Aldo Moro. It was very easy to approach and, therefore, any attacker could have easily play against him. Remember, by contrast, the famous day - unless I am mistaken - 2 December. When it was organized great day of Forza Italy, or People of Freedom, a national event with San Giovanni in Laterano: the historic square of all the major events that take place in Rome, able to contain any possible crowd, taking the square itself and its continuation as a Carlo Felice. Well, the crowd - of necessity - also had to blend the major national political, having to march side by side with ordinary citizens. But they were well surrounded by bodyguards and was virtually impossible to get to say hello or shake their hands, or even ask for an autograph, for those who have these hobbies.
Unlike the manner of offering to the public by Berlusconi as a lamb. Not is the first time it is attacked by some rowdy that more can be found among millions of people. I think that Berlusconi is exposed to these risks knowingly. We do not remember, we, the figure of the Pope inside a reinforced glass booth? But this makes sense to be with the people he claims to represent? Certain risks, I seem inevitable. What, though, I was immediately struck, and the tenor of some of solidarity. To sum up: "I give you my sympathy, but what happens to you you deserve it ... ". Other declarations, then exude blatant hypocrisy. I find that those who do not hear an order that, with sincerity, all forms of violence and to be unreservedly supportive con la vittima, farebbe meglio a tacere ed a risparmiarci lo spettacolo penoso della sua doppiezza, la sua “polpetta avvelenata”.
La violenza mediatica, il razzismo implicito, la menzogna, l’inganno, la manipolazione… sono gli ordinari e quotidiani ingredienti della nostra scena politica. Per Berlusconi, al di là di singole questioni politiche, io penso sempre allo schema teorico dell’Uno, del Molti e del Popolo. L’Uno è la figura del Capo, della guida e del leader capace di decidere e risolvere i nostri problemi a cui tutti pensiamo quando siamo nei nostri guai privati (lavoro, casa, carovita, ingiustizie...). I Molti, sono le oligarchie, gli ottimati, i nobili, le ristrette fasce che si trovano in posizioni di privilegio, spesso a scapito e sulle spalle del Popolo: vale a dire, tutti noi poveri disgraziati che sentiamo di non aver nessun potere, anche se ci dicono che siamo il Popolo sovrano, ma un sovrano che, in pratica, non conta nulla e che viene portato ‘pro forma’ a votare, per non decidere mai nulla. Se non dobbiamo farci illusioni, se non ce la sentiamo di credere ancora a Babbo Natale, è facile, però, fare quattro conti: meglio essere comandati da Uno solo, piuttosto che oppressi da una moltitudine. A sua volta, l’Uno dovrebbe comprendere che la sua forza è il Popolo, non i Molti che vorrebbero “fargli le scarpe”. Staremo, comunque, a vedere come evolve il dramma.
Chasing
news in real time, read:
"... According to intelligence sources, the man was treated for 10 years, for mental problems at the Policlinico of Milan."And I think, comparing everything to my problems, the "tooth aches" and that is coupled with the broken one to Berlusconi. The "crazy" true, that is - the unhappy people who need to be treated, but also preserved - if they can be dangerous for the next unsuspecting for years now, are in free circulation, on our streets and I think everyone we met someone who, perhaps, there has physically assaulted, but there has offended and insulted. The "wise men" whose fault is very serious to say what they think, without any form of violence to anyone, and say without pretense and hypocrisy, well, they are put in jail. In Germany alone, at least 15,000 each year. In Austria, the best known case is that of the historian Irving, but Irving is a well-known, there are thousands and thousands that are completely unknown and unknown to most who do not know what there is rotten in the kingdom of Denmark in Shakespeare's memory.
and read more about where you pull out of partisanship, the image of the "Pied Piper", already used for Hitler:
"And then the attack on Prime Minister Bersani:" We have nothing to gain from a model of democracy where there is a populist billionaire piping and all the poor souls who are behind. " Exactly! The fact that people are "poor."But these poor people know that many politicians, with neither art nor part, were no less "poor" (with "patches ...") and made his fortune with the policy for them was a "manna" a "deal". In short, their accommodation! Still, the policy - for most of the professional politicians - is a way to get rich and make a fortune for himself and for his family. Here, then, that much is worth to trust Berlusconi that of his and does not need a stipend from parliamentary pension for life with, in some cases, be granted for a single day's session. What it means to "populism", it is clearly understood from the passage quoted. They are afraid of the people, not the people want. Institutions? But which institutions? Everything is to be remade. And who can do it all if not 'A', outside the usual round?
How very sad and depressing news of Facebook groups that are divided between fans of Tartaglia and others in solidarity with Berlusconi. Although I also a member of Facebook, I have no sympathy for this network and I rarely use. I think not conducive to accountability, always necessary when you write. Of course, I do not mean that one should not be able to freely express his thoughts, but it's another thing they are celebrating physical violence against specific persons. Beyond the fact itself, I fear for the Network that I would like a free and safe from attempts at censorship. I fear the action of groups deliberately provocative. But I think the main culprits of the climate of "hate" are the main stream , major newspapers, television networks that encourage the general public and then do the dirty work for young people politically immature or naive, to which they have practice of armed hand. The group that arise spontaneously in the network and are not inflated by main stream do not exceed a few hundred units spread and have devastating impact: are neutralized within the network itself. Although these aspects are deplorable dangers threatening our democracy. If
so far can be seen that the criticism I lean to one side, update saying that I do not feel more comfortable in seeing the usual idiotic talk shows like "Friends" Berlusconi think they can profit from the event for a New crackdown on our freedoms, already seriously compromised. The referees that we have already seen us do not bode well. Really, it seems to me that the system becomes more and more speed and I wonder which may be our defenses, if any are still possible, if we reduce ourselves to go underground just to be able to freely exchange our views on the political situation of our country and the international situation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment